ReviewDigital health
Wearable vital-sign sensors for early detection of severe dengue and sepsis: Clinical applications and implementation in resource-limited settings.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Computer-assisted sensing in periprosthetic joint infection : Current evidence and future perspectives for wearables].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Early detection of infectious diseases using wearable sensor data through personalized baseline deviation modelling.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Severe dengue and sepsis account for tens of millions of cases and deaths annually in low-resource settings, where spot-check vital sign monitoring misses early physiological deterioration. Affordable wearable sensors that stream continuous data and feed machine learning algorithms promise earlier detection and improved outcomes. Methods: We conducted a structured narrative literature review of human studies on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar that evaluated wearable vital-sign devices for predicting severe dengue or sepsis in resource-limited areas. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and synthesized data on study design, devices, vital streams, predictive performance, and implementation barriers. Results: Seven eligible studies (2019-2024) from Vietnam, Rwanda, Bangladesh, and South Korea tested photoplethysmography or single-lead electrocardiography wearables in intensive care units and emergency departments of hospitals. The algorithms achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83-0.86 for forecasting dengue shock up to 2 hours and sepsis deterioration up to 5-48 hours before conventional recognition. The precision reached 0.79 for the three-level dengue severity classification. Continuous monitoring reduces the time to intervention and matches or exceeds the accuracy of manual charting. Conclusion: Early evidence shows that low-cost wearable sensors can deliver clinically meaningful lead times for severe dengue and sepsis in developing countries' hospitals. However, generalizability, artifact suppression, power autonomy, and economic sustainability remain unproven. Multicentre pragmatic trials, edge-optimized algorithms, and full cost-effectiveness analyses are needed before routine adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.