ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Fecal microbiota transplantation plus immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenges in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a single-arm exploratory study.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The use of antibiotic, probiotic, and fecal microbiota transplantation in modulating immunotherapy efficacy and survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.The oncologist · 2026Pooled it
- The lung-gut-brain axis in non-small-cell lung cancer: a narrative review with a systematic search of three signaling pathways.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- [Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Promising Avenue for Lung Cancer Therapy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Pooled it
- The microbiota-lymphocyte protective axis (MLPA): a novel paradigm for overcoming radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and potentiating the efficacy of tumor immuno-combination therapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Harnessing Gut Microbiota to Enhance Immunotherapy in NSCLC: From Mechanisms to Translational Applications.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Cancer Neuro-Immunity.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbial metabolites and the gut-lung axis in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: evidence boundaries and translational implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Microbiome as a prediction of immunotherapy response in lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The gut microbiome in colorectal cancer: molecular paradigms and translational frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression on initial immunotherapy represents a significant clinical challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge is a considered option, yet its efficacy remains limited. Strategies to enhance the efficacy of ICI rechallenge are urgently needed. There is a pressing need for novel strategies to sensitize tumors to ICI rechallenge. Previous studies have established a correlation between the gut microbiota and the tumor response to immunotherapy, and have explored the application of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in modifying the immune response by restoring the gut microbiota. However, the potential of FMT from healthy donor to reverse immunotherapy resistance in patients with NSCLC has not been previously investigated. This preliminary study aimed to provide initial insights into the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of the combined therapy of FMT from healthy donor with immunotherapy rechallenge in NSCLC patients. Methods: In this single-arm exploratory study, patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after prior immunotherapy were screened and enrolled based on predefined eligibility criteria, including prior response to ICIs and adequate organ function. Eligible patients received oral FMT capsules from healthy donors followed by rechallenge with camrelizumab. The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility [incidence of adverse events (AEs) graded by CTCAE v5.0]. Secondary end points included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Fecal and blood samples were collected for exploratory analyses of microbiota, metabolome, and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire. Results: Seven patients (all male, median age 55 years) were enrolled and constituted the analysis population. The majority (5/7) had received three or more prior lines of therapy. During the follow-up period, none experienced grade 4 or higher AEs. The treatment-related AEs were mainly associated with immunotherapy, and only grade 1 FMT-related AEs (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, bloating, and constipation) were reported. One patient achieved a partial response (PR) and one achieved stable disease (SD) with PFS times of 14.6 and 8.1 months, respectively. The median PFS was 1.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-1.75], and the OS was 12.1 months (95% CI: 0.3-23.9) for all patients. Moreover, the treatment modulated the composition of the intestinal flora in all patients, with alpha diversity increasing in responders and decreasing in non-responders. Conclusions: The results indicated that the combined therapy of FMT and immunotherapy rechallenge was feasible and demonstrated a tolerable safety profile in this small cohort. The observed clinical activity is preliminary. These findings support the need for larger, controlled trials to assess the efficacy of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.