Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234592›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and either limited or extensive synchronous metastatic spread in Germany-a population-based cancer registry cohort study.

Sophia Bertram, Antje Schliemann, Alexander Katalinic, Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner, Ron Pritzkuleit, Dorothee Twardella, Annika Waldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophia BertramInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Antje SchliemannInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Alexander KatalinicInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Soo-Zin Kim-WannerHessian Cancer Registry, Hessian Office for Health and Care, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ron PritzkuleitSchleswig-Holstein Cancer Registry, Registry Department at the Institute for Cancer Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Dorothee TwardellaBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Bavarian Cancer Registry-Coordination Office, Munich, Germany.
Annika WaldmannInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies considerably depending on the extent and pattern of metastatic spread. While the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification introduced distinctions between M1a, M1b and M1c stages, further stratification within M1c-particularly regarding the number of organ systems involved-has not been extensively studied in large, unselected cohorts. Therefore, population-based evidence on survival differences with respect to metastatic spread is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with limited (LMS) or extensive metastatic spread (EMS). Our classification approximates the clinical concepts of oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease, which differ in prognosis and therapeutic approaches. Methods: Data from three German population-based cancer registries were requested for NSCLC patients (ICD-10 C34) diagnosed between 2016 and 2020, aged ≥18 years, with at least one day of follow-up. Only patients with synchronous metastases [Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage IV] were included. Metastatic spread was classified according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification and further subclassified according to the number of organ systems involved: intra-thoracic limited metastatic spread (IT-LMS corresponds to M1a), single extra-thoracic limited metastatic spread (ET-LMS corresponds to M1b), limited multi-organ involvement (LMOI corresponds to M1c with ≤3 organs involved), and extensive multi-organ involvement/generalised disease (EMOI corresponds to M1c with >3 organs involved). Descriptive analyses were performed by subgroup. OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the association between survival and the extent and location of metastases. Results: A total of 8,033 patients with synchronous metastatic NSCLC were included. Of these, 7,277 had LMS (IT-LMS: n=1,767; ET-LMS: n=1,314; LMOI: n=4,196) and 756 had EMOI. Median OS ranged from 15 months (IT-LMS) to 4 months (EMOI). Patients with LMOI had significantly better survival than those with more than three organs involved (EMOI, median OS: 8 Conclusions: Stratification of synchronous metastatic NSCLC by extent of metastatic spread, including further differentiation within M1c, revealed clear differences in OS and PFS. These findings suggest that the number of organ systems involved may be a clinically relevant parameter and support further evaluation of subclassification approaches in population-based cohorts.

Indexed as

limited metastatic spread (LMS)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)oligometastatic diseasepopulation-based cancer registriessurvival

Identifiers

PMID41234592
PMCPMC12605718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.