Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234577›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Influencing factors and prediction of growth heterogeneity in solid nodule non-small cell lung cancer based on artificial intelligence: a prospective study.

Jiaqi Chen, Jianing Liu, Linlin Qi, Fenglan Li, Shulei Cui, Jianwei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaqi Chen *Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianing Liu *Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linlin QiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fenglan LiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shulei CuiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The identification of rapidly growing solid nodules (SNs) through various preliminary examinations and their prompt removal can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with solid nodular lung cancer. However, previous studies have mostly focused on determining the nature of the solid nodules, with limited research on their growth heterogeneity. This study aimed to identify multi-dimensional factors influencing rapid nodule growth based on clinical, imaging, pathological, and genetic characteristics and provide a predictive model for solid nodule lung cancer growth. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 250 pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nodules. Patients underwent preoperative thin-layer computer tomography (CT) scans with a median preoperative follow-up time of 75.5 (37.0, 273.3) days. All SNs in this study were divided into rapid (volume doubling time, VDT ≤200 days) and the slow growth group (VDT >200 days). Clinical data, imaging findings, pathological characteristics, and genetic mutations were analyzed. The Deep Wise Artificial Intelligence workstation was used to assess radiological qualitative features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors. Results: According to the VDT, 66.4% of the SNs grew slowly. Smoking history, CT value, and deep lobulation sign were risk factors for the rapid growth of nodules {area under the curve: 0.704 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.636-0.771], sensitivity: 65.5%, specificity: 70.5%}. Pathologically, in the following order, squamous cell carcinoma had the fastest growth rate (squamous cell carcinoma > large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma > adenosquamous carcinoma > pleomorphic carcinoma > adenocarcinomas). Pathological histology type and degree of differentiation were risk factors for rapid growth (P=0.009, 0.006). Among the 168 nodules that underwent genetic testing, 75.6% had genetic mutations. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene were the most common (43.4%). Mutations in tumor protein 53 (TP53) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations were enriched in adenocarcinomas with high-grade components (P=0.005, 0.03). Mutations in EGFR exon 21 L858R/19del and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) differed between mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinomas (P<0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between nodule growth rates and gene mutations. Conclusions: Based on preoperative clinical and imaging data, rapidly growing nodules could be identified for early resection. Smoking history, CT values, and deep lobulation were critical predictors of rapid SN growth. Squamous cell carcinomas and poorly differentiated tumors accelerated nodule growth. Gene mutations drove the differentiation of NSCLC cells but did not regulate their growth rate.

Indexed as

gene mutationpathologyradiologySolid nodular lung cancervolume doubling time (VDT)

Identifiers

PMID41234577
PMCPMC12605479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.