Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234570›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025

Utility of bronchoalveolar lavage in checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis evaluation: a narrative review.

Senthuran Shivakumar, Sagun Parakh, Natalia Vukelic, Farzaneh Atashrazm, Vivek Naranbhai, Nicole Soo Leng Goh, Jessica Da Gama Duarte, Tracy Li-Tsein Leong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Senthuran ShivakumarDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-0493
Sagun ParakhOlivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3891-2489
Natalia VukelicOlivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Farzaneh AtashrazmOlivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-8160
Vivek NaranbhaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-8882
Nicole Soo Leng GohDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica Da Gama DuarteOlivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4289-5204
Tracy Li-Tsein LeongDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-1505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer treatment over the past few decades; however, their successes in clinical trials and real-world settings have been tempered by immune-related adverse events (IrAEs). Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), the leading cause of IrAE-related mortality, poses a significant challenge to clinicians due to non-specific clinical features and unpredictable disease trajectory. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a diagnostic procedure that offers insight into the immune and molecular processes underlying CIP. This review presents the current role and application of BAL in the evaluation of CIP, explores current literature, and discusses how recent advances in research and technology may shape future approaches to its diagnosis and management. Methods: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify recent literature evaluating BAL findings in CIP. This review synthesizes findings from these studies to provide an up to date and comprehensive overview of the role of BAL in CIP management. Key Content and Findings: Current guidelines recommend BAL in symptomatic patients when the diagnosis of CIP remains uncertain, primarily to exclude infection and other disease processes. However, the unpredictable clinical course of CIP narrows the window of opportunity to safely perform BAL. Variable utilisation of BAL in clinical practice may also be attributed to the lack of clinically reliable and applicable biomarkers that could improve diagnostic clarity. Beyond lymphocytosis, a well-recognised finding in BALs of patients with CIP, the role of specific immune cell populations and molecular drivers in shaping a proinflammatory microenvironment has been highlighted in multiple emerging studies. Advances in molecular profiling, immunogenomics, and lung microbiome research hold promise for enhancing our understanding of CIP pathogenesis and guiding future approaches to its diagnosis and management. Conclusions: In current clinical practice, BAL remains an important investigation to support a diagnosis of CIP; however, its diagnostic value remains uncertain. Enhanced understanding of the CIP immune landscape is fundamental to identifying robust diagnostic and predictive biomarkers that could improve diagnosis and patient outcomes in cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP)drug-induced interstitial lung disease (drug-induced ILD)immunotherapypneumotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41234570
PMCPMC12605103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.