Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234569›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Deep learning radiomics and

Furui Duan, Hanyu Zu, Rui Zhang, Yan Li, Yu Zhao, Xuewei Wang, Minghui Zhang, Ping Li, Dalong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Furui Duan *PET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2455-4422
Hanyu Zu *Radiology Department, Binzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Binzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-9584
Rui ZhangPET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5894-5288
Yan LiPET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6390-8749
Yu ZhaoPET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8992-9821
Xuewei WangImage Center Department, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0341-2602
Minghui ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5207-5643
Ping LiPET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-3670
Dalong WangPET/CT Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-8701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accurate lymph node staging is vital for prognosis and treatment planning. However, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is limited by false positives, and morphology-based criteria lack reliability. This study aimed to develop and validate a PET/CT-based deep learning radiomics (DLR) approach to distinguish benign from malignant lymph nodes. Methods: A total of 217 hypermetabolic lymph nodes from 185 NSCLC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics and DenseNet121-based deep network features were extracted from PET/CT images. Clinical and imaging variables were selected using logistic regression (LR), correlation analysis, and recursive feature elimination (RFE). Nine machine learning models were trained and externally validated; diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Results: Our study demonstrated that the artificial neural network (ANN) and extra trees (ET) models exhibited superior diagnostic performance in identifying suspected malignant lymph nodes in NSCLC patients. Specifically, the ANN achieved an AUC of 0.865, sensitivity of 66.7%, and accuracy of 82.0% on the test set, while the ET model performed best in the external validation set with an AUC of 0.865, sensitivity of 76.9%, and accuracy of 80.4%. Tumor location, lymph node long-to-short axis (L/S) ratio, and bilateral hilar Conclusions: The PET/CT-based DLR model accurately differentiates benign from malignant lymph nodes, outperforming conventional methods. Combining DenseNet121-derived features with radiomics improves staging accuracy and aids personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

deep learninglymph node metastasis (LNM)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID41234569
PMCPMC12605760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.