Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234548›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Factors associated with repeat contact with an out-of-hours mental health crisis service: an observational study.

Kate Gemma Richards, Emily Eyles, Paul Scott, Mark Jackson, Heleni Covary, Theresa Redaniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate Gemma RichardsUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1295-6148
Emily EylesUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-7172
Paul ScottPublic Health, Bath and North East Somerset Council, Keynsham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0434-1535
Mark JacksonBath Mind, Bath, UK.
Heleni CovaryBath Mind, Bath, UK.
Theresa RedanielUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Repeat attendances to healthcare services are common. Safe Spaces are innovative non-clinical mental health support services, which aim to address service gaps in crisis management. They are often offered in collaboration with the voluntary and community sector and are delivered in the community as a welcoming and comfortable space for anyone with mental health needs to seek support. To date, there is limited evidence exploring repeat engagement with these services. Our objective was to describe the frequency of repeat contacts with a Safe Space service and to investigate associated factors. Methods: Data were collected by Bath Mind Breathing Space, in Bath and North East Somerset between April 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was repeat contact. Exposure variables included age, gender, ethnicity, existing mental health diagnosis, presenting symptoms and lifestyle and physical health factors. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess exposure variables' association with repeat contact. Results: Repeat contact with the service occurred in 50% of cases (252). Clients reporting symptoms of depressive disorder (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.63), or suicidal ideation or self-harm (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.87) were more likely to have a repeat contact. Having a diagnosis of psychosis (Coeff 3.53, 95% CI 1.67 to 7.39) was associated with an increase in total contacts. Conclusions: Breathing Space has a high proportion of repeat contacts. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to best support clients with symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation or self-harm or a diagnosis of psychosis to ensure care optimisation.

Indexed as

Community HealthEmergenciesMental HealthPublic HealthTertiary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID41234548
PMCPMC12606496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.