ArticleBMJ public health2025
Factors associated with repeat contact with an out-of-hours mental health crisis service: an observational study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Repeat attendances to healthcare services are common. Safe Spaces are innovative non-clinical mental health support services, which aim to address service gaps in crisis management. They are often offered in collaboration with the voluntary and community sector and are delivered in the community as a welcoming and comfortable space for anyone with mental health needs to seek support. To date, there is limited evidence exploring repeat engagement with these services. Our objective was to describe the frequency of repeat contacts with a Safe Space service and to investigate associated factors. Methods: Data were collected by Bath Mind Breathing Space, in Bath and North East Somerset between April 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was repeat contact. Exposure variables included age, gender, ethnicity, existing mental health diagnosis, presenting symptoms and lifestyle and physical health factors. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess exposure variables' association with repeat contact. Results: Repeat contact with the service occurred in 50% of cases (252). Clients reporting symptoms of depressive disorder (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.63), or suicidal ideation or self-harm (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.87) were more likely to have a repeat contact. Having a diagnosis of psychosis (Coeff 3.53, 95% CI 1.67 to 7.39) was associated with an increase in total contacts. Conclusions: Breathing Space has a high proportion of repeat contacts. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to best support clients with symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation or self-harm or a diagnosis of psychosis to ensure care optimisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.