Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234533›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Framing as a mechanism to overcome the temptation of bad habits.

Shuning Wang, John Monterosso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuning WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
John MonterossoDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral neuroscience generally conceives of habits as under stimulus-response control, and distinguishes habits from goal-directed behavior based on their insensitivity to outcome value (features of automaticity). However, the everyday meaning of "bad habits" is applied primarily to behaviors that are compelling, in part, because of their anticipated outcome value. In particular, commonly identified bad habits (e.g., overuse of social media, overeating, smoking) are repeated behaviors that yield appealing immediate outcomes, but at a greater longer term cost ("temptations"). We begin by evaluating the role of both automaticity and temptation in the maintenance of bad habits. Next we focus on how framing effects can be used to shift the balance of motivation away from immediate and/or toward delayed outcome value, including a partial summary of what is known about the neural substrates that mediate such shifts. We pay particular attention to the way frames can promote replacing bad habits with good habits through emphasizing the connection between specific choices and general policy preferences.

Indexed as

delay discountingframing effectshabitsself-controltemptation

Identifiers

PMID41234533
PMCPMC12605160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.