Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234531›Full record

ReviewCardiac failure review2025

Emerging Pharmacological and Invasive Therapies for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Obstructive Physiology.

Emily Li-Wen Chu, Daniel Seung Kim, Ahmad Masri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiac failure review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Forward Dynamics: Modern Insights into Mitral Systolic Anterior Motion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily Li-Wen ChuDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Stanford, CA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-7120
Daniel Seung KimDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Stanford, CA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-1909
Ahmad MasriDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-6526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a prevalent condition characterised by ventricular hypertrophy, which results in left ventricular outflow obstruction in two-thirds of patients. Traditional pharmacological therapies, including β-blockers, calcium channel blockers and disopyramide, have been the cornerstone of symptom management but lack disease-modifying effects. The introduction of cardiac myosin inhibitors as the first therapy to directly target sarcomeric hypercontractility has dramatically changed clinical practice. However, several logistical factors presently limit the widespread adoption of cardiac myosin inhibitors, and their long-term side-effects and outcomes require ongoing investigation. Emerging pharmacological approaches, including EDG-7500 and gene therapies, aim to refine treatment strategies. For patients with refractory symptoms, invasive septal reduction therapies, including surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation, remain critical. Innovations such as radiofrequency ablation and septal scoring along the midline endocardium (SESAME) offer promising, minimally invasive alternatives. As treatment options expand, optimising patient selection, monitoring protocols and long-term outcomes remain essential to advancing care for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Indexed as

cardiac myosin inhibitorHypertrophic cardiomyopathymavacamtenmyectomymyotomyradiofrequency ablationseptal reduction therapy

Identifiers

PMID41234531
PMCPMC12606454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.