ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Beyond Monotherapy: Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Dual Biologic Strategies in Rheumatic Diseases.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Janus kinase inhibitor and rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: is it a safe combination?Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although numerous biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are available, substantial number of rheumatic patients fail to achieve therapeutic goals with sequential monotherapy. Dual biologic therapy (DBT) may overcome treatment resistance by concomitantly inhibiting multiple inflammatory pathways. In rheumatoid arthritis, DBT shows moderate efficacy improvements but consistently higher serious infection rates compared to monotherapy, particularly with rituximab and JAK inhibitor combination-based regimens. In psoriatic arthritis, studies demonstrate possible benefits especially with combinations targeting alternate pathways, eg, apremilast with biologics or IL-17/IL-23 inhibitors with TNF blockers, though safety concerns exist. The multi-domain nature of PsA makes DBT particularly attractive in achieving global disease control. In axSpA, evidence of efficacy is also limited but encouraging in treatment-refractory disease. However, major research gaps persist. Data remain limited and largely heterogeneous, with limited disease-specific studies and a paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most available reports derive from small case series or single-center experiences, limiting the generalizability of findings. Geographic variation further complicates interpretation, as infection risk, treatment accessibility, and pharmacovigilance capacity differ markedly between developed and resource-limited regions. Therefore, this narrative review aims to summarize current evidence while emphasizing the unmet clinical and research needs surrounding DBT, highlighting the necessity for systematic reviews, large-scale registries, and context-specific studies to inform safe and equitable clinical application worldwide. While DBT may be beneficial in carefully selected patients with treatment-refractory disease, current evidence does not consistently demonstrate increased efficacy. Thus, DBT should be reserved for refractory cases where benefits outweigh risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.