ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2025
Comparative Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Versus Conservative Treatment in Super-Elderly Patients With Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of PFNA in treating intertrochanteric fractures in super-elderly patients. Methods: This study included patients aged over 90 years admitted to the orthopedic department of our hospital with intertrochanteric fractures between January 2021 and December 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: the surgical group, which received treatment with PFNA, and the conservative group, which underwent tibial tubercle skeletal traction. PSM was additionally applied to control for confounding biases. Comparisons were conducted between the two groups concerning VAS scores at 1 week and 3 months post-admission, fracture healing time, complication rates, HHS, and SF-36 at the final follow-up, as well as 1-year survival rates. Results: A total of 112 patients were enrolled, including 36 in the surgical group and 76 in the conservative group. After performing 1:1 PSM on baseline characteristics such as gender, age, BMI, bone density, Evans-Jensen classification, ASA grade, and CCI, 32 pairs of data were obtained, with 32 patients in the surgical group and 32 in the conservative group. Follow-up results indicated that the surgical group experienced faster pain relief, shorter fracture healing times, and lower incidence rates of most complications. Additionally, the HHS and SF-36 scores at the final follow-up were higher in the surgical group, and the one-year survival rate was also greater than that of the conservative group ( Conclusion: For super-elderly patients with relatively good physical conditions who suffer from intertrochanteric fractures, the use of PFNA fixation, compared to conservative treatment, can achieve better limb function, a lower incidence of complications, and a higher survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.