Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
A randomized controlled prospective study comparing surgical outcomes of median umbilical ligament lift-up and Veress needle entry techniques in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy versus robotic multi-port hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade on Postoperative Acute and Chronic Pain in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery.Journal of pain research · 2026Trial
- Two strategies to reduce costs of robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological cases: a German model for intraoperative cost minimisation and counteracting the shortage of physicians.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of endometrium by transvaginal ultrasound and baseline factors as a predictor for endometrial abnormalities in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.BMC women's health · 2026Observational
- Single-port laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for treatment of ovarian cysts ≥ 5 cm in the first and early second trimester of pregnancy: a retrospective comparative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred minimally invasive technique for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in gynecology. Although it is associated with lower overall complication rates compared to open surgery, most serious complications occur during the initial step of abdominal entry. Therefore, developing faster and safer entry methods is critical to improving surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the surgical results of the median umbilical ligament lift-up (MULU) technique routinely used in our clinic with the commonly preferred Veress needle (VN) entry technique. Materials and methods: This randomized, controlled, prospective study included 124 patients: 64 underwent abdominal entry with the MULU technique and 60 with the VN technique. Demographic data such as age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric, surgical history, and menopausal status were recorded. Key perioperative outcomes, including abdominal entry time, number of attempts, insufflation failure, vascular or visceral injury, bleeding at the trocar site, infection, hematoma, and hernia were documented and analyzed. Results: The VN group had a significantly higher mean age (50.03 years) compared to the MULU group (45.42 years) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in height, weight, or BMI. The MULU technique had a significantly shorter mean entry time compared to VN (71.5 vs. 146.3 s, respectively, p < 0.001). Extraperitoneal insufflation occurred in 6.7% of VN cases and was absent in the MULU group (p = 0.036). Gastric or intestinal injury occurred in 3.3% of VN patients, with none observed in the MULU group. Omental injury was only seen in the MULU group (3.1%). No significant differences were found in vascular injury, bleeding, or prior surgical history. Conclusions: The MULU technique, based on anatomical guidance via the median umbilical ligament, is a safe and effective method for abdominal entry. It offers faster access and may reduce the risk of major complications, making it a viable alternative to conventional techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.