Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234464›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2025

A randomized controlled prospective study comparing surgical outcomes of median umbilical ligament lift-up and Veress needle entry techniques in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Gazi Güner, Ayşe Bacaksiz, Can Berk Karabudak, Figen Efe Çamili, Çisem Ertok, Sinem Özşahin Kiliç, Zeliha Zeynep Satilmişoğlu, Can Tercan, Nazlı Aylin Vural

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gazi GünerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-0335
Ayşe BacaksizDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-2324
Can Berk KarabudakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7609-0626
Figen Efe ÇamiliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-7963
Çisem ErtokDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1028-9146
Sinem Özşahin KiliçDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-2788
Zeliha Zeynep SatilmişoğluDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-8102
Can TercanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-6294
Nazlı Aylin VuralDivision of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat State Hospital, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0493-5439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred minimally invasive technique for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in gynecology. Although it is associated with lower overall complication rates compared to open surgery, most serious complications occur during the initial step of abdominal entry. Therefore, developing faster and safer entry methods is critical to improving surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the surgical results of the median umbilical ligament lift-up (MULU) technique routinely used in our clinic with the commonly preferred Veress needle (VN) entry technique. Materials and methods: This randomized, controlled, prospective study included 124 patients: 64 underwent abdominal entry with the MULU technique and 60 with the VN technique. Demographic data such as age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric, surgical history, and menopausal status were recorded. Key perioperative outcomes, including abdominal entry time, number of attempts, insufflation failure, vascular or visceral injury, bleeding at the trocar site, infection, hematoma, and hernia were documented and analyzed. Results: The VN group had a significantly higher mean age (50.03 years) compared to the MULU group (45.42 years) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in height, weight, or BMI. The MULU technique had a significantly shorter mean entry time compared to VN (71.5 vs. 146.3 s, respectively, p < 0.001). Extraperitoneal insufflation occurred in 6.7% of VN cases and was absent in the MULU group (p = 0.036). Gastric or intestinal injury occurred in 3.3% of VN patients, with none observed in the MULU group. Omental injury was only seen in the MULU group (3.1%). No significant differences were found in vascular injury, bleeding, or prior surgical history. Conclusions: The MULU technique, based on anatomical guidance via the median umbilical ligament, is a safe and effective method for abdominal entry. It offers faster access and may reduce the risk of major complications, making it a viable alternative to conventional techniques.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyLigamentsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeedlesPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUmbilicusComplicationlaparoscopic entryumbilicus lift techniqueVeress needle

Identifiers

PMID41234464
PMCPMC12611389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.