Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Psychometric validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Chinese adolescent and adult psychiatric inpatient populations.

Wei Li, Jia-Yi Yin, Qian Wang, Jie Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei Li *Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Jia-Yi Yin *Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Clinical and Health Psychology Department, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhongBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Clinical and Health Psychology Department, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depressive disorder represents a major public health burden globally, yet the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)-a widely used depression screening tool-remains underexplored in Chinese psychiatric inpatient populations, particularly in age-stratified analyses. This study aimed to (1) validate the Chinese version of the PHQ-9 in Chinese psychiatric inpatients (contrasting with community-based findings) and (2) compare its psychometric properties between adolescent and adult inpatients. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 485 psychiatric inpatients (including 105 adolescents) from Shanxi Bethune Hospital. Participants completed the Chinese version of the PHQ-9. Analyses encompassed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Gaussian Graphical Model-based network analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff scores. Results: Results showed the PHQ-9 had good internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.876 (adolescents) and 0.883 (adults). CFA revealed no significant difference in fit between the unidimensional and two-factor (cognitive-affective vs. somatic) models in adolescents (Δχ²=0.79, p=0.374), with both models showing marginal fit (likely affected by small sample size). In adults, the two-factor model was preferred (Δχ²=6.49, p=0.011). The Network Comparison Test found no significant differences in network structure (M = 0.211, p=0.598) or global strength (S = 0.262, p=0.186) between age groups, but the adolescent network had poor stability (correlation stability coefficient = 0), limiting interpretation. ROC analysis identified age-specific optimal cutoffs exceeding the conventional threshold of 10: 15.5 for adolescents (sensitivity=0.84, specificity=0.47) and 14.5 for adults (sensitivity=0.79, specificity=0.66). Notably, 64.7% of the total sample scored ≥15 on the PHQ-9, while only 43.7% had a primary diagnosis of depressive disorder (ICD-11 6A7), indicating comorbid depressive symptoms contributed to higher cutoffs. Conclusion: The findings of this study validate the structural validity and diagnostic validity of the PHQ-9 among Chinese adult psychiatric inpatients, while emphasizing that the interpretation of its factor structure in the adolescent population requires caution. The age-related symptom topological patterns indicated by network analyses are highly likely to be influenced by the insufficient size of the adolescent sample and need to be confirmed by subsequent studies. The results of the ROC curve highlight the clinical significance of formulating population-specific diagnostic cutoffs; however, the impact of comorbidity on the findings of this study must be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

adolescentChinese psychiatric inpatientsdepressive disorderPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)validity

Identifiers

PMID41234432
PMCPMC12605919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.