ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A feasibility and acceptability study of liberate: an online, peer-supported, psychoeducational intervention for ultra processed food addiction.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of the Science on Ultra-processed Foods and the Ultra-processed Food Addiction Construct.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Validating CRAVED: a brief screening instrument for ultra-processed food addiction.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Case management of ultra-processed food addiction: a theoretical perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Changes in binge eating symptoms following an online community-based ultra-processed food addiction intervention: Liberate.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Integrating the management of ultra-processed food addiction into type 2 diabetes care: a clinical response to De Silva et al, (2025) and practical recommendations for practitioners.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ultra-processed food addiction (UPFA) is a growing popular topic in the research arena. There are calls for its classification for diagnosis as a substance use disorder and behavioural disorder. Although evidence for UPFA is increasing, effective interventions remain scarcely available. This is a feasibility ty -50and acceptability study of "Liberate," an online, peer-supported psychoeducation intervention for adults self-identifying with UPFA. Methods: A single-group, pre- and post-mixed methods study with 6-month follow-up was used. Participants (n=86) attended a 6-week coach-led online programme which comprised educational sessions, peer-to-peer support, and a personalised abstinence or harm reduction approach to dietary changes. Quantitative data included UPFA symptom measurements (YFAS 2.0, CRAVED), mental wellbeing (WEMWBS), and anthropometrics (weight, kg, and body mass index [BMI]). Acceptability was assessed qualitatively using semi-structured interviews which were then analysed thematically using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results: Recruitment and retention rates were acceptable. Statistically significant improvements were observed in UPFA symptoms (YFAS mean reduction: -3.4; 95% CI: -4.5, -2.3), CRAVED scores (-1.4; 95% CI: -1.8, -0.9), and mental wellbeing (5.4; 95% CI: 3.2, 7.6) from baseline, post-intervention, and sustained at 6-month follow-up. BMI and weight change also showed a statistically significant reduction, but this was clinically negligible. Thematic analysis revealed high acceptability, with participants reporting greater self-awareness, reduced impulsive eating and eating behaviours, and increased confidence in managing UPFA symptoms. They found Liberate to be a psychologically safe and non-judgemental space, becoming aware that it was "not my fault," and developing hope of a future beyond the intervention. Peer support and education on the effects of addiction on the brain were reported as being particularly beneficial. They expressed a desire that healthcare professionals would refer to Liberate. Conclusion: This study finds "Liberate" an online UPFA intervention, to be a feasible and acceptable intervention. Further investigation through a randomised controlled trial would be needed to establish causality, long-term effectiveness, and potential scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.