ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
How digital support and digital competence influence digital resilience of college students in an online learning environment.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI anxiety and AI dependence among undergraduates: a moderated mediation model of AI self-efficacy and AI literacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students' experiences and perceptions-cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the deep integration of digital technology and education, online learning has become a primary learning method for college students. However, issues such as information overload, technological risks, and a lack of presence frequently arise, intensifying the information cocoon phenomenon, which exposes students to more uncertainties and challenges in learning process, making it urgent for them to possess digital resilience to cope effectively. The study conducted a questionnaire survey among 4894 college students from China to explore the impact mechanism of digital support and digital competence on digital resilience. SPSS 27.0 and Amos 27.0 were used to perform reliability, validity and discriminant validity tests, descriptive statistics, and structural equation modeling. Meanwhile, Mplus 8.0 was applied for multiple-indicator and multiple-cause analysis. The research results indicate that both digital support and digital competence significantly influence digital resilience. Meanwhile, interpersonal interaction, including social and academic interactions, act as mediators between digital support, digital competence and digital resilience. Furthermore, the impact of digital competence on interpersonal interaction and digital resilience is considerably higher than that of digital support. The results of multiple-indicator and multiple-cause indicate that after adding covariates, the action paths and directions between the variables remain unchanged, with only slight changes in coefficients. It proves that the model constructed has good robustness. The study reveals the formation mechanism of college students' digital resilience in the online learning environment. It also provides empirical evidence and practical paths for enhancing students' technical adaptability, risk response ability and continuous learning ability in the digital environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.