Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234376›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Isolated Effects of Bone, Spring and Surgical Parameters on the Surgical Outcome in Spring-Assisted Sagittal Synostosis Correction.

Jenson Jacob, Selim Bozkurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenson JacobSchool of Engineering Ulster University Belfast UK.
Selim BozkurtSchool of Engineering Ulster University Belfast UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-8653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sagittal synostosis can be corrected using spring-assisted cranioplasty which, involves removing bony parts from the skull and inserting compressed springs to expand the skull. However, surgical outcomes in spring-assisted cranioplasty may remain suboptimal due to the interacting effects of skull, and spring parameters and surgical settings. Therefore, understanding the effects of skull and spring parameters, and surgical settings, on surgical outcomes is crucial to improving spring-assisted cranioplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the isolated effects of calvarial bone and spring parameters and surgical settings on the surgical outcome in the correction of sagittal synostosis with spring-assisted cranioplasty. A 3D parametric skull model with sagittal synostosis was used to simulate spring-assisted cranioplasty. Computational simulations were used to simulate the effects of spring, surgical, and skull parameters. Results showed that relatively low elastic modulus and thickness in the calvarial bones had remarkable effects on surgical outcomes in sagittal synostosis after spring-assisted cranioplasty. However, after spring-assisted cranioplasty, the post-operative cranial index increased a little for higher elastic modulus and thickness in the calvarial bones. Therefore, evaluating the mechanical and geometric properties of the skull during surgical planning may ensure successful surgical outcomes in sagittal synostosis treated with spring-assisted cranioplasty.

Indexed as

sagittal synostosisspring‐assisted cranioplastysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41234376
PMCPMC12610409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.