ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Isolated Effects of Bone, Spring and Surgical Parameters on the Surgical Outcome in Spring-Assisted Sagittal Synostosis Correction.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal synostosis: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes : Ten-year outcomes of spring-assisted cranioplasty for isolated sagittal synostosis: a single-institution cohort study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Isolated Effects of Bone, Spring and Surgical Parameters on the Surgical Outcome in Spring-Assisted Sagittal Synostosis Correction.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sagittal synostosis can be corrected using spring-assisted cranioplasty which, involves removing bony parts from the skull and inserting compressed springs to expand the skull. However, surgical outcomes in spring-assisted cranioplasty may remain suboptimal due to the interacting effects of skull, and spring parameters and surgical settings. Therefore, understanding the effects of skull and spring parameters, and surgical settings, on surgical outcomes is crucial to improving spring-assisted cranioplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the isolated effects of calvarial bone and spring parameters and surgical settings on the surgical outcome in the correction of sagittal synostosis with spring-assisted cranioplasty. A 3D parametric skull model with sagittal synostosis was used to simulate spring-assisted cranioplasty. Computational simulations were used to simulate the effects of spring, surgical, and skull parameters. Results showed that relatively low elastic modulus and thickness in the calvarial bones had remarkable effects on surgical outcomes in sagittal synostosis after spring-assisted cranioplasty. However, after spring-assisted cranioplasty, the post-operative cranial index increased a little for higher elastic modulus and thickness in the calvarial bones. Therefore, evaluating the mechanical and geometric properties of the skull during surgical planning may ensure successful surgical outcomes in sagittal synostosis treated with spring-assisted cranioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.