ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025
The Interface of Trauma Surgery and Interventional Radiology: The Trauma Surgeon's Perspective.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trauma as a critical condition in the very old: assessment, care pathways and outcome differences.European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Association of prophylactic transcatheter arterial embolization with perioperative blood loss and operative time in complex acetabular fractures: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trauma remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, responsible for over 4.4 million deaths annually. Advances in imaging and technology have shifted modern trauma care toward the increased use of nonoperative management. This review explores the evolving collaboration between trauma surgery and interventional radiology (IR), presenting the trauma surgeon's perspective of this multidisciplinary collaboration. IR offers minimally invasive, organ-preserving interventions, which reduce the morbidity associated with open surgery and improve patient outcomes. The article reviews standardized trauma assessment protocols, the utility of imaging modalities such as FAST and CT, and the role of efficient multidisciplinary collaboration. It emphasizes the importance of institutional protocols to streamline communication, reduce time to intervention, and ensure timely IR activation. Key IR procedures, such as transarterial embolism (TAE), balloon occlusion, and stent or stent-graft placement, are explored in the context of managing solid organ injuries (spleen, liver, kidney), pelvic fractures, and vascular and extremity trauma. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including resource availability and inconsistent protocol adherence. Future efforts must focus on enhancing training, improving communication, and data-driven protocol refinement to guide nonoperative management. Strengthening this interdisciplinary collaboration is critical to optimizing patient outcomes and advancing evidence-based, nonsurgical trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.