ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Research on non-destructive detection model of tomato fruit quality based on electrical properties and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advancements on innovative technologies and applications for non-destructive monitoring of tomato quality.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To break through the limitations of traditional destructive detection methods, achieve rapid, non-destructive, and accurate detection of internal tomato quality, and provide more efficient technical means for agricultural product quality assessment, this study proposes a novel predictive method that integrates a Long Short-Term Memory Autoencoder (LSTMAE) and XGBoost (LSTMAE-XGBoost). This method combines the feature extraction capabilities of the autoencoder, the sequence data processing abilities of LSTM, and the high-precision prediction capabilities of XGBoost. Within the frequency range of 0.1-1000 kHz, electrical parameters such as parallel equivalent capacitance, parallel equivalent resistance, and quality factor-among nine electrical parameters-were obtained from 300 tomato samples using an electrical parameter analyzer. Additionally, four indicators-vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble protein, and titratable acidity-were obtained through physicochemical analysis of the tomatoes. Based on the electrical parameters and internal physicochemical indicator data of the tomatoes, a non-destructive detection model for tomato internal quality indicators was constructed. Experimental results demonstrate that the LSTMAE-XGBoost model exhibits superior adaptability. In the test set, the coefficients of determination for vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble protein, and titratable acidity were 0.805, 0.945, 0.838, and 0.845, respectively. Compared to traditional machine learning models, this model offers better prediction accuracy. It improves upon the traditional Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) feature extraction method by 14.3%, 13.1%, 7.8%, and 9.5%, respectively. Furthermore, LSTMAE-XGBoost can simultaneously predict all four indicators, enhancing the model's efficiency. Therefore, LSTMAE-XGBoost can be utilized as an effective ensemble model for non-destructive detection of tomato internal quality indicators, which holds significant importance for fruit quality non destructive detection in the horticultural industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.