ReviewBioactive materials2026
Next-generation smart ophthalmic biomaterials: From passive response to active interaction and closed-loop control.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart and stimuli-responsive hydrogels for controlled exosome delivery in bone tissue engineering: from passive carriers to intelligent therapeutic platforms.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Extended Ocular Drug Delivery for the Ocular Surface.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prosthetic Corneal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Keratoprostheses and the Future Prospects of New Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Food-Grade Microgels for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Design, Fabrication, and Targeted Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancements in nanomaterials for the treatment and management of vascular surgeries: from drug delivery to biomedical implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Porcine Corneal Models as Translational Platforms for Innovative Therapies: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophthalmic biomaterials are undergoing a rapid transition from inert implants to intelligent, adaptive systems that respond to the spatiotemporal complexity of ocular disease. Conventional materials provide structural support and baseline biocompatibility but rarely adapt to the evolving ocular microenvironment shaped by biochemical and biomechanical cues. Recent advances have delivered stimuli-responsive platforms that release therapeutics or modulate mechanics in response to stimuli such as pH, temperature, enzymatic activity, or mechanical strain. Yet most current strategies remain reactive or preprogrammed, lacking closed-loop, autonomous control. Here we present an evolutionary framework for ophthalmic biomaterials, tracing the shift from passive structures to interactive and emerging closed-loop systems that integrate sensing, on-board decision-making, and actuation. We synthesize advances across the first three generations, delineate core design principles, functional transitions, and clinical implementations, and highlight systems-level integration challenges. Finally, we identify critical opportunities and design principles for intelligent, self-adaptive platforms, providing a conceptual basis for the rational design of next-generation, closed-loop ocular therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.