ReviewGlobal journal on quality and safety in healthcare2025
Transforming Healthcare: A Scoping Review of the Significance of Value-Based Healthcare.
Review in Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a competency framework for operating room nurse specialist training instructors: a Delphi study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is supplanting the traditional volume-based healthcare paradigm in healthcare systems. In the healthcare industry, value creation focuses on the health outcomes that individuals and institutions achieve while maintaining an optimal cost-benefit ratio. This scoping review aimed to determine the essential components and results of VBHC implementation. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the patient, intervention, and outcome model. PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched using a combination of keywords. The search results were then subjected to a step-by-step screening protocol to identify the related studies and extract data. Results: The initial database search identified 3055 studies. After removing duplicates, 1920 studies were eligible for title/abstract screening. Abstract/title screening identified 268 studies, of which 115 studies were selected for full-text screening. Fifteen studies were selected for the scoping review after full-text screening. Analysis revealed that 73% of studies reported improved interdisciplinary collaboration, 67% demonstrated enhanced patient-centered care approaches, and 60% showed measurable cost reductions. Key implementation factors included strong leadership (identified in 87% of studies), patient involvement (reported in 80% of studies), and integrated care units (implemented in 73% of studies). All studies agreed on the importance of VBHC in improving patient care quality and reducing costs. Conclusion: VBHC can help improve the overall healthcare experience. The VBHC model is a promising strategy to enhance healthcare effectiveness and long-term viability; however, successful implementation requires careful attention to organizational factors and stakeholder engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.