ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Electrophysiological Biomarkers Reflect Target Engagement and Response Using Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stimulation-evoked orbitofrontal activity as a biomarker for DBS personalization in depression.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) is an effective treatment for severe, treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, optimizing lead placement and stimulation parameters remains a challenge. DBS evoked potentials (EPs) recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) during surgical lead placement could serve as intraoperative biomarkers for target engagement and clinical efficacy. Methods: We obtained intraoperative EEG recordings on the forehead from 10 patients (2 nonresponders) undergoing ALIC DBS surgery for OCD. Monopolar stimulation at 2 Hz was delivered through all electrode contacts, and EEG EPs were analyzed in relation to stimulation contact, white matter connectivity to the prefrontal cortical regions of interest (assessed via probabilistic tractography), and reduction in symptom severity (assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale). Results: We observed consistent DBS EPs with 3 oscillatory peaks (∼35, ∼75, and ∼120 ms) across all patients. EP amplitude varied across contacts, with the largest responses occurring when the location of stimulation overlapped with the preoperatively defined tractographic target. Higher EP amplitudes recorded on the forehead correlated with greater white matter connectivity to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex/orbitofrontal cortex and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Treatment nonresponders exhibited less consistent EP waveforms across lead contacts. Conclusions: These findings suggest that intraoperative EPs provide valuable insights into ALIC DBS target engagement. EP characteristics may serve as biomarkers to refine DBS targeting and predict clinical response, offering a potential tool for optimizing DBS therapy for OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.