ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Intimate partner violence among women with multiple sclerosis.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intimate partner violence among women with multiple sclerosis.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Intimate partner violence (IPV), a highly prevalent issue in women with chronic disorders, is rarely discussed and remains unrecognized, especially among patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence and characteristics of IPV among female patients with MS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2024 among married women diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) aged between 15 and 50 years, with a minimum duration of diagnosis of one year, in Isfahan MS center. IPV experiences were documented via a partially structured interview and a pre-designed questionnaire. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Results: Among 400 participants in this study, approximately 52% encountered incidences of IPV. Physical violence was the most prevalent form (60% of victims), followed by emotional (50% of victims) and sexual (16% of victims) forms. No significant association between incidents of IPV and demographic data of the patients and their spouses was found. Conclusion: Although IPV is considerably prevalent among female patients with MS, it severely lacks recognition. All women with MS, regardless of their sociodemographics, might be subject to violence. To prevent IPV, protective measures, including training programs for neurologists and neurology-associated healthcare providers, must be employed. Future research should focus on exploring the negative effects of IPV on disease progression and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.