Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234197›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2025

Antibiotic consumption patterns in acute care hospitals: an integrated analysis using regression modelling combining data from two surveillance systems, Germany, 2022.

Karin Gröschner, Winfried V Kern, Tim Eckmanns, Birgitta Schweickert, Gesche Först, Ulrike Georgi, Marcel Feig, Michaela Steib-Bauert, Niklas Willrich, Katja de With

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karin GröschnerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Winfried V KernDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital and Medical Centre, and Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Tim EckmannsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Birgitta SchweickertDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Gesche FörstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital and Medical Centre, and Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrike GeorgiADKA-Bundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Marcel FeigDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Michaela Steib-BauertDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital and Medical Centre, and Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
Niklas WillrichDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Katja de WithInstitute of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDTo enhance antibiotic stewardship and effectively address antimicrobial resistance (AMR), better understanding of subnational antibiotic consumption patterns is essential.AIMWe aimed to assess antibiotic consumption in Germany using data from 2022 and integrated from two surveillance systems, focusing on regional differences by examining non-university acute care hospitals.METHODSWe used pharmacy dispensing data from 525 regional or local hospitals and 35 university hospitals, covering 46.5 million patient days (PD), nearly half of all occupied bed days nationwide, to calculate antibiotic use densities (AUD) for systemic antibiotics, expressed as World Health Organization (WHO) ATC/DDD (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 PD). The analysis primarily focused on consumption patterns in non-university hospitals, assessing key antibiotic groups through mixed-effects regression. For sensitivity analyses, we employed hospital-adapted daily dose definitions.RESULTSPooled AUD for participating non-university hospitals was 51.8 DDD/100 PD, with aminopenicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitors being the most prescribed group. Regression analyses, adjusted for hospital size and ward type/admitting specialty, indicated notable regional variation. We identified statistically significant differences in antibiotic consumption, particularly for beta-lactam antibiotics, fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines. For example, several regions exhibited up to 1.4-fold higher use of first- and second-generation cephalosporins compared with the western reference region.CONCLUSIONThis study highlights substantial regional variation in antibiotic use in German acute care hospitals, underlining the importance of further investigation into influencing factors such as regional guidelines and resistance rates. The methodological approach applied here may serve as a model for other countries interested in analysing regional differences in antibiotic consumption.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDrug UtilizationHospitalsPractice Patterns, Physicians'GermanyHumansPopulation SurveillanceRegression AnalysisAnti-Bacterial Agentsacute care hospitalsantibiotic consumptionGermanyregional differencesregression modellingsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41234197
PMCPMC12633710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.