ArticleGenetics2026
Sex-specific evolutionary programs shape recombination rate evolution in house mice.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination rates vary across species, populations, and sexes. House mice (Mus musculus) present a particularly extreme example. Prior studies have established large differences in global recombination rates between M. musculus subspecies and inbred strains, with males exhibiting more extensive variation than females. The observation of sex-limited variation has prompted the hypothesis that male and female recombination rates may evolve by distinct evolutionary mechanisms in M. musculus. Here, we formally evaluate this hypothesis in a phylogenetic framework. We combine cytogenetic estimates of genomic crossover counts with published data to compile a large dataset of sex-specific crossover rate estimates totaling >6,000 single meiotic cells from 31 genetically diverse inbred mouse strains representing five Mus species and four M. musculus subspecies. We show that the phylogenetic distribution of male recombination rates is well predicted by the underlying Mus phylogeny (phylogenetic heritability, HP2 = 0.82), contrasting with the weaker phylogenetic signal observed in females (HP2 = 0.24). M. m. musculus males exhibit a marked increase in recombination rate compared to males from other M. musculus subspecies, prompting us to test explicit models of lineage-specific evolution. We uncover evidence for an adaptive increase in male recombination rate along the M. m. musculus subspecies lineage but find no support for a parallel increase in females. Taken together, our findings confirm the hypothesis that recombination rate evolution in house mice is governed by distinct sex-specific evolutionary regimes and motivate future efforts to ascertain the sex-specific selective pressures and sex-specific genetic architectures that underlie these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.