ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Adjuvant treatment algorithm based on recent ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for early endometrial carcinoma according to prognostic risk groups.
Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concordance between multidisciplinary tumor board decisions and AI-based recommendations in endometrial cancer: impact of discordance direction on clinical outcomes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is unfortunately increasing. Often diagnosis is made at an early stage and surgery is the curative treatment. Nevertheless, adjuvant treatment is proposed to reduce the risk of relapse. This treatment is tailored based on the extent of the disease, such as the presence of distant metastasis, the extent of involvement of adjacent organs or lymph nodes. However, histological parameters such as myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, invasion of the cervical stroma or tumor grade are also key to selecting adjuvant treatment. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project has demonstrated the superiority of molecular classification over histological evaluation in EC to determine the prognosis. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2023 staging for EC is the first staging system that has incorporated molecular biomarkers on top of morpho-histological classification. Currently, all patients should have a molecular profile of their tumor and a lymph node assessment. The landmark treatment of stage I-III ECs is surgery followed by radiotherapy. The European guidelines updated in 2025 has divided EC in 4 risk categories with specific adjuvant treatment. For clinicians, it is seen as a complex landscape from surveillance to chemo-radiotherapy. Therefore, we propose here a practical pocket guideline for adjuvant treatment of early-stage EC patients based on a review of the different clinical trials in the adjuvant setting and on existing guidelines. This pocket guideline may also serve as a base for incorporation of new clinical trials under the RAINBO umbrella research program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.