ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Effects of Serum Incubation on Lipid Nanoparticle PEG Shedding, mRNA Retention, and Membrane Interactions.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Membrane environment sets the functional pKBiophysical journal · 2026Article
- From Morphology to Mechanism: Cryo-Electron Microscopy Insights into Lipid Nanoparticles for RNA Delivery.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Analytical Characterization and Stability Assessment of RNA-Based Vaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Functional Reclassification of Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems and Advances in Formulation Strategies and Manufacturing Challenges.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Rewriting Tumor Entry Rules: Microfluidic Polyplexes and Tumor-Penetrating Strategies-A Literature Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Click Chemistry Mediated Immune Synapse Augmentation in Natural Killer Cell-Cancer Membrane Engagement and Facilitated Anticancer Efficacies of Natural Killer Cell Therapy.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are widely used for RNA delivery, but their efficiency remains limited, largely due to poor endosomal escape. Upon administration, proteins bind to the surface of the LNPs, influencing cellular uptake and potentially altering their interfacial properties. Such alterations may also affect their interaction with endosomal membranes, thus influencing the critical endosomal escape step. Using fluorescence microscopy imaging with single-LNP resolution, this study investigates how incubation in 10% fetal bovine serum alters the PEG modification and mRNA content of LNPs, as well as how serum incubation-induced alterations influence the interaction between LNPs and an anionic supported lipid bilayer (SLB), serving as a simplistic mimic for the anionic lipid membrane of late endosomes. We demonstrate that serum incubation leads to the desorption of PEG-modified lipids and a significant release of mRNA cargo from the LNPs. PEG shedding occurred consistently with a half-life time of around 10 min, while mRNA release displayed higher variability between individual LNPs. We also observed that serum preincubation enhanced attractive interactions between tethered LNPs and the anionic SLB at physiological pH 7.4, and fusion of LNPs with the anionic SLB upon pH reduction was more efficient for serum-preincubated LNPs than for their pristine counterparts, particularly during moderate acidification from pH 6.5 to 6.0. This enhanced fusion efficiency may be attributed to a reduced steric hindrance from PEG-lipids following serum preincubation. The findings highlight that serum-induced modifications enhance LNP fusion efficiency with an endosomal membrane mimic while potentially compromising mRNA retention, thus balancing the overall efficacy of LNP-assisted mRNA delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.