ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
The roles of amygdala subnuclei in processing of approaching in- and outgroup others in virtual space.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating the functional neural network dynamics of cognitive-affective action planning during threat processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activity in the amygdala during intergroup contact and prejudice has been explained as a conditioned threat response and as a social saliency response. More recently, the theory that both explanations are true has received some empirical support, suggesting that the amygdala subnuclei (basal, lateral, and central) may play distinct roles in the social categorization process. In this study, we used machine learning to decode amygdala subregion activations during simulated encounters with protagonists representing four different stereotypes. In these encounters, a generalized threat was presented: the protagonists initially remained at a distance, then approached the participant, and finally entered their personal space. Using a time-resolved decoding approach, we studied the effect of interpersonal distance on the subnuclei's prejudice response. Moreover, a second classification was used to evaluate how the group relevance modified the perceived generalized threat. Both classifications revealed that all amygdala subregions encoded stereotype content. The likelihood of successful stereotype classification in each subregion was modulated differently by the context. Methodologically, our results show that a time-resolved decoding approach provides tools for studying prejudice within the amygdala's subnuclei. Neuroscientifically, our results support the theorization of different and parallel functions of amygdala subnuclei in prejudice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.