ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Eating disorder cognitions: a comparison between Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Anorexia Nervosa.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We might be making mistakes, but we're learning, we're trying, and we're listening": embedding qualitative methods within the plan-do-study-act cycle to support the development of a pilot multidisciplinary ARFID pathway.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Co-Occurrence of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to investigate whether individuals with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) experience unhelpful cognitions that overlap with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). It also examines whether these cognitions play a role in driving problematic eating behaviours that are typically associated with AN because they are designed to prevent weight gain.
methodsThere were 184 participants (68 individuals with AN, 61 individuals with ARFID, and 55 people with no eating disorder) who were screened using Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria. Participants were an adult community sample who completed an anonymous online survey. Questionnaires measured core beliefs, assumptions and automatic thoughts that are associated with AN, and an assessment of concerns about weight and shape was completed. An observational design was used to compare how responses varied according to diagnosis.
resultsIndividuals with ARFID were found to have significantly higher levels of disordered core beliefs, assumptions, automatic thoughts, and weight/shape concerns than people with no eating disorder. They showed lower levels of these cognitions relative to individuals with AN. Disordered assumptions and automatic thoughts explained a large proportion of variance in behaviours intended to prevent weight gain in this group.
conclusionsThe findings have implications for the diagnosis and treatment of ARFID. They challenge diagnostic conceptualisations of ARFID as entirely separable from other eating disorders and any associated weight/shape concerns. They also highlight the need for clinicians to assess and treat unhelpful cognitions that may be maintaining disordered patterns of eating. Future research directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.