ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Multi-class brain tumor MRI segmentation and classification using deep learning and machine learning approaches.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain tumor classification using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning. The differentiation between malignant and benign brain tumors and their subtypes remains a challenging task that can benefit from advanced computational techniques. PURPOSE: This study uses an MRI dataset to explore the effectiveness of deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) approaches for classifying brain tumors. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset comprising 1200 DICOM brain tumor MRI images, representing malignant and benign tumors with six subtypes, was prepared. Each image was converted to a 512 × 512-pixel digital format, selecting 200 images per tumor class. Image quality was enhanced using sharpening algorithms and mean filtering. The proposed edge refined binary histogram segmentation (ER-BHS) was applied to extract hybrid features from the regions of interest. Feature optimization through a correlation-based method reduced the dataset to 11 key features. Multiple classifiers, including DL, neural networks, and ML models, were evaluated on the optimized dataset using 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsAmong the tested models, the random committee (RC) classifier demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 98.61% on the optimized hybrid brain tumor MRI dataset. Overall, DL and ML methods effectively automated brain tumor classification.
conclusionThe promising results affirm the potential of DL and ML approaches to enhance medical image analysis and improve diagnostic accuracy in brain tumor classification, potentially revolutionizing clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.