ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Involvement of underserved 18-40 year olds living with early-onset type 2 diabetes in the M3 NIHR programme grant.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe M3 Research Programme is funded by an NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research (NIHR201165), and aims to develop and test the effectiveness of an innovative multifactorial management intervention to address multimorbidity in young adults (aged 18-40 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes ('early-onset type 2 diabetes'). We reflected on the involvement of young adults, who in some cases additionally experienced intersectional exclusion.
methodsReflective discussion groups were conducted with research personnel and public contributors, and a collaborative online forum was used to further provide opportunity for public contributors to share their thoughts.
resultsThemes drawn from the reflections and online forum aligned well with the NIHR UK Standards for Public Involvement. DISCUSSION: Tips for good practice in public involvement of young adults were derived. (1) Build collaborative team culture. (2) Open and honest reflective communication. (3) Communicate team responsibilities clearly. (4) Plan involvement with public contributors. (5) Embed public involvement early in the project. (6) Assess resource requirements realistically. (7) Gain support and engagement from clinical teams. (8) Be flexible, offering a range of ways to get involved. (9) Include contingency and risk planning as part of public involvement planning. (10) Provide training in public involvement, cultural competence, and contingency and risk planning. (11) Develop policies and procedures that support public involvement. The reflection also afforded some insight into facilitators of academic engagement in delivery of public involvement activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.