ArticleFrontiers in zoology2025
Evolutionary history reveals information on the functionality of ear tufts in owls (family: Strigidae).
Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEar tufts are plumage features which have particularly high prevalence in owls (Strigidae). Several hypotheses have been developed to explain their function, mostly including camouflage, species recognition, deterring predators/mobbers, and visual signaling among conspecifics. In the present study, we used phylogenetically-informed comparative approach to reconstruct evolutionary history of ear tufts across the entire Strigidae family (184 species). Specifically, data on the occurrence and relative size of ear tufts compiled from color plates and photographs were analyzed in relation to life history and ecological traits.
resultsWe found that ear tuft occurrence coevolved with circadian activity rhythm and predominated in species with strictly nocturnal activity. The highest evolutionary rate was found for transitions from nocturnal to mixed activity in species without ear tufts and from mixed towards nocturnal activity in species with ear tufts. Consistently, strictly nocturnal owl species showed larger ear tufts (controlling for differences in body size) compared to species with mixed activity. We also found that owls preying upon birds had relatively larger ear tufts. Finally, a strong phylogenetic signal in tuft occurrence provided evidence for high evolutionary conservedness of this trait.
conclusionsOur results suggest that ear tufts may enhance camouflage of nocturnal owls during the daylight rest, when they might be threatened by visually oriented predators or mobbed by their potential prey. Our results lay foundations for further experimental research required to determine the ultimate function of ear tufts in owls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.