ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Transformations in doctor-patient responsibilities in China's quasi-marketised healthcare system.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causes of medical disputes in China and Japan from physicians' perspectives: a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing a series of systemic reforms, China's healthcare system now takes a quasi-marketised form, with an uneasy combination of state regulation and market mechanisms, which has fundamentally reshaped the distribution of responsibilities between doctors and patients. This study employs institutional theory to analyse the institutional factors in shaping the doctor-patient responsibilities within the current healthcare system.
methodsThis qualitative study involved thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 28 doctors and patients from various provinces in China. Participants were purposively selected to reflect diverse experiences across healthcare settings. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify and interpret key patterns within the data.
resultsThree main dimensions of privatisation emerged from the analysis: accessing healthcare, care coordination, and healthcare financing. Findings indicate that marketisation has significantly increased the responsibilities placed on individual doctors and patients, effectively transferring systemic burdens to these individuals. Doctors face intensified pressures to manage care within fragmented health services, while patients confront greater personal responsibility in navigating access to care, coordinating their treatments, and handling healthcare expenses.
conclusionsThis study extends the application of institutional theory to the healthcare context. It demonstrates the regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive dimensions of the healthcare system in shaping and constructing of doctor-patient responsibility. The concept of privatised responsibilities proposed here provides a useful theoretical lens for analysing the effects of quasi-marketisation and offers a foundation for future research on doctor-patient responsibility and accountability in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.