ArticleBMC psychology2025
Differences in cognitive control under negative emotion priming among college students with varying emotional regulation abilities.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The association between academic emotions and self-efficacy among nursing undergraduates: a cross-sectional regression analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using the AX-CPT paradigm, this study investigates the differences in cognitive control under negative emotion priming among college students with different emotional regulation abilities in reactive control mode and proactive control mode. The paradigm comprises four experimental conditions AY, BY, BX, and AX trials designed to distinguish between proactive control and reactive control modes.The experiment employed a 2 (high emotional regulation ability group vs. low emotional regulation ability group) × 4 (AY, BY, BX vs. AX) mixed experimental design, with reaction times and error rates recorded using E-prime software. The results revealed that: (1) the error rate was significantly lower in the high emotional regulation ability group compared to the low emotional regulation ability group (2) subjects displayed significantly longer reaction times on AY sequences than on BX sequences, with a significantly higher error rate on AY sequences; (3) in reactive control mode, the average reaction time for the high emotional regulation ability group was significantly shorter than that for the low emotional regulation ability group, with a higher d'-target value; in proactive control mode, the high emotional regulation ability group had a significantly higher d'-context value than the low emotional regulation ability group. These findings indicate that under negative emotion priming, college students with varying emotional regulation abilities exhibit enhanced proactive control and weakened reactive control. college students with high emotional regulation abilities exhibit superior cognitive control in both reactive and proactive control modes compared to those with low emotional regulation abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.