Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233843›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Automated detection and segmentation of chondromalacia patella on axial knee MRI using YOLOv11 and a custom CNN: a deep learning-based diagnostic model.

Erdal Güngör, Husam Vehbi, Mehmet Batu Ertan, Ahmetcan Cansın

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erdal GüngörDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, İstanbul Medipol University Bahçelievler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. egungor_49@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-2166
Husam VehbiDepartment of Radiology, Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-3768
Mehmet Batu ErtanDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-9967
Ahmetcan Cansınİstanbul Medipol University International School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1484-4370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate a deep learning pipeline using YOLOv11 for segmentation and a custom CNN for classification to automatically detect and assess chondromalacia patella on axial knee MRI, aligning with expert clinical evaluation. MATERIALS AND

methodsA dataset of 650 axial knee MRIs was analyzed. YOLOv11 segmented the patellofemoral region, and a custom CNN classified chondromalacia. Performance was assessed using segmentation accuracy, classification accuracy, confidence scoring, and Grad-CAM-based visual explainability.

resultsThe CNN achieved a test accuracy of 82.30% on 113 images, with an AUC of 0.87, indicating promising but preliminary discriminative ability. Grad-CAM maps showed reasonable agreement with expert interpretation.

conclusionThe proposed YOLOv11-CNN pipeline demonstrated promising accuracy and may provide a potentially useful and interpretable solution for the detection and segmentation of chondromalacia patella on MRI, with the possibility of enhancing efficiency and consistency in orthopedic radiology workflows after further validation.

Indexed as

Chondromalacia PatellaeDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansChondromalacia patellaConvolutional neural network (CNN)Deep learningKnee MRIYOLOv11

Identifiers

PMID41233843
PMCPMC12613751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.