ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Barriers to helicopter emergency medical services in a Haze-Prone, mountainous region of Northern Thailand.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower limb amputation by emergency medical technicians: a case report from scene.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers to Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Operations in Nepal: A Retrospective Study of Mission Cancellations.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveTo identify factors associated with the mission outcome (transport completed vs. not transported) of air medical transport (AMT), with particular attention to environmental and operational constraints such as haze-related air pollution.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all requests to the Northern Thailand Sky Doctor program (SkyDoc) from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2024. Patient demographics, mission characteristics, environmental conditions, and operational variables were extracted from program records and merged with daily PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations from the national air quality monitoring network. The primary outcome was mission outcome, defined as transport completed versus not transported. We analyzed factors associated with non-transport.
resultsAmong 656 mission requests, 412 (62.8%) were transport and 244 (37.2%) were not transported. Patients were predominantly male (57.2%) with a median age of 49 years (IQR 28-67). The most frequent diagnostic categories were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (32.3%), major trauma (21.2%), and stroke (11.7%). Non-transport was most often due to medical contraindications (25.8%), aircraft or landing-zone unavailability (23.8%), adverse weather (18.9%), and haze-related air pollution (12.7%). Seasonal peaks in not transport were observed from February through April, coinciding with regional surges in particulate matter. In multivariable analysis, twilight-hour requests (16:00-20:00) were associated with non-transport (adjusted OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.67; p < 0.01), whereas secondary missions were more likely to be transport than primary missions (adjusted OR 3.51; 1.47-8.40; p < 0.01). Higher PM2.5 concentrations were independently associated with non-transport (adjusted OR 0.99; 0.97-0.99; p = 0.018). PM10 was not associated with outcomes.
conclusionAMT in northern Thailand is constrained by both medical and environmental factors. Twilight-hour requests, mission type, and PM2.5 concentrations independently influenced mission completion. These findings highlight the need for haze-adapted flight protocols, enhanced forecasting, and system-level strategies to safeguard patient access to aeromedical care during seasonal pollution surges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.