Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233767›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Digital nudges and gamification: how the China state promotes citizens to manage chronic diseases in neighborhoods.

Ronghui Yang, Yanchao Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ronghui YangCollege of Humanities, Donghua university, Shanghai, China.
Yanchao HanCollege of Humanities, Donghua university, Shanghai, China. hanyanchao@dhu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,China 2232025B-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic diseases pose a growing threat to public health and have raised widespread social concern in China. In response, the Chinese government has rolled out chronic disease management campaigns at the community level to curb disease incidence. However, low public participation constrains their effectiveness. Although campaign-style mobilization has been widely studied, less is known about how digital nudges, particularly gamification, enhance citizen engagement in Chinese communities.

methodsTo address this gap, we conducted in-depth interviews with sixty Chinese stakeholders to examine how the Chinese state nudged individuals toward proactive chronic disease management using gamified mechanics.

resultsWe identify four core gamification elements, including dramatization, level-up progression, rewards, and socialization, that function as digital nudges. These gamified interventions can significantly reduce participants' cognitive burden, amplify their perceived benefits of self-care, enhanced individual agency, and foster supportive social networks. However, the sustainability of these gamified interventions is undermined by misaligned reward structures, standardized level-up progression systems, and unresolved intra-community conflicts.

conclusionsTo overcome these obstacles, we propose implementing culturally attuned reward mechanisms, dynamically tailored challenge pathways, and robust online community governance to foster enduring public engagement. By revealing China's neighborhood-level digital nudge approaches, this research not only enriches global understanding of gamified chronic disease management but also provides transferable design principles for public health interventions worldwide.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth PromotionNeighborhood CharacteristicsAdultChinaChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchChronic diseaseCitizensGamificationNeighborhoodsState

Identifiers

PMID41233767
PMCPMC12613420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.