Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233724›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025

Interfacing mechanistic and breeding scheme simulation to predict selection response on lactation efficiency in dairy cows under different nutritional environments.

A Bouquet, M Slagboom, J R Thomasen, M Kargo, N C Friggens, L Puillet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A BouquetQGG Center, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. alban.bouquet@qgg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-7284
M SlagboomQGG Center, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
J R ThomasenQGG Center, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
M KargoQGG Center, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
N C FriggensINRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR MoSAR, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
L PuilletINRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR MoSAR, 91120, Palaiseau, France.

Funding

H2020 Societal Challenges 727213 - GenTORE project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting selection response for lactation efficiency in dairy cows is challenging, as the expression of this complex trait depends on dynamic interactions between the ability of cows to acquire nutrients and allocate them to different life functions. Moreover, the relative emphasis of these components may change due to energetic trade-offs between life functions when kept in limiting environments. The objective of this study is to present a new approach combining mechanistic and breeding scheme simulations to predict selection response on components of lactation efficiency of dairy cows under a non-limiting nutritional environment and when transferred to a limiting environment with a moderate feed restriction. These predictions were compared to the ones obtained with the conventional method used in quantitative genetics considering a typical dairy cattle breeding scheme and several breeding goals (BG) aiming at improving milk production, lactation efficiency and fertility.

resultsIn the non-limiting environment, selection responses predicted by the two methods differed for both milk production and fertility. The sign and magnitude of differences depended on BGs. Selection response predictions were consistent only for BGs that did not change much the body reserve mobilization patterns of cows, and hence their conception probability. Indeed, pregnancy status impacted energy allocation of cows and consequently milk production, more energy being allocated to lactation in case of reproductive failure. Differences in selection response between modelling approaches were slightly increased when cows were reared in the limiting environment. Overall, the choice of prediction method led to substantial BG reranking with respect to selection response on milk production and fertility. Mechanistic-based predictions of selection response for lifetime efficiency were also sensitive to the nutritional environment and BG.

conclusionsCombining mechanistic and genetic modelling is a promising approach to benchmark breeding strategies of dairy cow lactation efficiency and better anticipate the impact of changes in energetic trade-offs induced both by selection and changes in the nutritional environment. Moreover, the simulations of phenotypic trajectories over cow lifetime before and after selection enabled a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying genetic improvement.

Indexed as

BreedingLactationSelection, GeneticAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleComputer SimulationDairyingFemaleFertilityMilkModels, GeneticPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41233724
PMCPMC12616986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.