ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
CODABEILLES: a reliable reference library of COI DNA barcodes for French wild bees monitoring (Apoidea: Anthophila).
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cleptoparasitic bees (Apoidea, Anthophila) in rural protected areas in Latium (Italy): a faunistic survey through an integrative taxonomic approach.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Building a reliable 16S mini-barcode library of wild bees from Occitania, south-west of France.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Anthropocene, the decline of insect pollinators poses a significant threat to ecosystem services, particularly to wild bee populations essential for plant biodiversity and agricultural productivity. France, with 983 species, hosts one of the most diverse bee faunas in Europe, yet these species face growing pressures from habitat loss, climate change, and intensive agriculture. Addressing this crisis requires robust taxonomic frameworks and efficient species identification methods to support long-term monitoring initiatives such as the European Pollinator Monitoring Scheme, EU-PoMS. DNA barcoding, utilizing the COI-5P gene, has proven effective for species delineation and biodiversity monitoring, particularly in detecting cryptic diversity among genera with large numbers of species such as Andrena, Nomada or Lasioglossum. However, significant gaps remain in reference libraries, particularly for the species from the Mediterranean Basin. To bridge this gap, the CODABEILLES initiative was launched in 2021 to enhance barcode data for the French bee fauna. Initially, only 25% of species had barcodes from French voucher specimens, increasing to 62% when considering voucher specimens from other countries. By 2025, thanks to collaboration with sixteen specialists and institutions, CODABEILLES contributed 1477 reference barcodes, covering approximately 560 species and raising barcode coverage to 82%. When integrating data published under other initiatives over the same period the coverage reaches 94% of the French bee fauna. This dataset significantly enhances species identification accuracy and supports large-scale pollinator monitoring through metabarcoding and environmental DNA approaches. Despite the success of COI-5P barcoding, taxonomic inconsistencies persist, necessitating further integrative research. This study underscores the need for continued collaboration among taxonomists, molecular biologists, and conservationists to refine species classifications and ensure comprehensive reference databases. The improved barcode coverage provided by CODABEILLES paves the way for more accurate DNA-based monitoring of wild bee populations and their ecological interactions, crucial for guiding conservation strategies in the face of ongoing environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.