ReviewMikrochimica acta2025
Label-free phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing on microfluidic platforms: a review of advances and translation.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Electrochemical Diagnostic Developments for Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Role of Aptamers and Nanomaterials.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Smart Bioaerosol Monitoring: Advanced Sampling and Sensing across Environmental, Clinical, and Industrial Domains.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The escalating global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates a paradigm shift towards rapid and scalable diagnostic technologies. Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods, while reliable, are hindered by prolonged turnaround times (often 16-24 h) and complex workflows, limiting their utility at the point-of-care (POC). Label-free phenotypic AST methods integrated within microfluidic platforms present a compelling alternative, enabling real-time, high-throughput monitoring of bacterial responses without the need for costly or time-consuming fluorescent labels and reagents. This review provides a comprehensive analysis and comparative evaluation of four primary label-free detection modalities: electrical impedance sensing, light scattering, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and machine vision powered by artificial intelligence (AI). We critically examine the principles of each technique, its integration with microfluidics, and its performance, highlighting studies that have demonstrated AST results in critically short timeframes (< 2-4 h) with high accuracy. Furthermore, we uniquely synthesize progress in commercial translation, discuss persistent challenges such as standardization and sample preparation, and provide a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis to chart the future trajectory of the field. By offering a critical roadmap that bridges fundamental innovation with clinical application, this review demonstrates the potential of label-free microfluidic systems to deliver reagent-free, rapid, and scalable diagnostic solutions in the fight against AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41233678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.