ReviewNature food2025
Adjustments, evidence and political tensions in the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Review in Nature food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) plays a key role in the US food system. As Congress considers major changes to it under the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act and states propose restrictions on what benefits may be used to purchase food, SNAP sits at the intersection of food security, labour market policy and public health. Drawing on historical experience and empirical economic evidence, we assess the impact of the proposed changes on SNAP, showing that specific policy solutions could improve outcomes without increasing programme costs, while simplified enrolment procedures could increase programme participation and reduce food insecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41233588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.