ArticleScientific reports2025
Key characteristics of medical parole applications in Massachusetts in 2022-2023.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The United States has a rapidly aging prison population with complex medical comorbidities. Medical parole has been proposed as a mechanism to address the heavy medical burden posed by the aging and chronically ill prison population. Current studies demonstrate medical parole is underutilized, but little is known about the factors considered when rendering a medical parole decision. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of medical parole applications in Massachusetts and identify predictors of the final parole decision. We conducted a retrospective review of 31 applications submitted by a non-profit legal services organization between 2022 and 2023. Univariate analysis demonstrated that a supportive superintendent recommendation and prison-contracted clinician assessment that an applicant could not perform ADLs independently were statistically significant factors in approval of medical parole. Unexpectedly, a history of disciplinary action while incarcerated was also associated with a higher likelihood of application approval, suggesting prior disciplinary action does not decrease the chances of a successful parole application. Our study suggests the superintendent and prison medical clinicians are key stakeholders with influence on the likelihood of approval of a medical parole application. Further work is needed to assess parole board decision-making when evaluating applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.