ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical and environmental investigation of six cases of Chryseobacterium arthrosphaerae infections in a Southern Italian hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends and Epidemiological Patterns of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms in a Burn Unit: An 11-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Brazil.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chryseobacterium spp. are Gram-negative, opportunistic pathogens antibiotic-resistant commonly found in the environment. The aim of this study was to investigate potential sources of Chryseobacterium infections in healthcare settings by comparing clinical and environmental isolates using phenotypic and genotypic analyses. Between June and July 2023, six cases of infection with Chryseobacterium spp. were identified in a hospital in Apulia, southern Italy. Environmental sampling (air, surfaces and water) was performed in parallel with routine clinical investigations. Isolates were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing and genotypic analysis using Sanger and Next-Generation Sequencing. Five cases of Chryseobacterium spp. infection were recorded in the Gastroenterology Department (Pavilion A) and one in the Vertebral Surgery Department (Pavilion B). C. indologenes was identified in blood and tracheal aspirate samples using MALDI-TOF MS. Environmental analysis carried out in the pavilions A and B isolated C. indologenes from sink tap in Pavilion B. Subsequently, genome sequencing revealed that Chryseobacterium strains misidentified as C. indologenes were more closely related to C. arthrosphaerae. Genetic analysis confirmed the cluster hypothesis involving four patients from the pavilion A, while no genetic link was found between the environmental and clinical strains. Innovative molecular methods in clinical and environmental investigations have allowed more accurate identification of the etiologic agent and possibly tracing the source of infection in the nosocomial setting. Control measures, such as patient isolation and room disinfection, have prevented the spread of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.