ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
Huntington disease: somatic expansion, pathobiology and therapeutics.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stage-dependent tau-PET signatures in Huntington's disease revealed by [¹⁸F]PI-2620.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Targeting toxic HTT1a could be the key to treating Huntington disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Article
- Stimulating proteasomal degradation in human proteinopathies.The FEBS journal · 2026Review
- Narcolepsy is (not) an autoimmune disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Review
- Spontaneous speech and language measures as predictive biomarkers of clinically meaningful disease progression and neurodegeneration in Huntington's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Roles of MAPKs, Including Those Activated by BDNF/TrkB, and Their Contribution in Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Chorea-predominant SCA5 mimicking Huntington's disease: A case report with a novelClinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026Article
- TheBrain and neuroscience advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expansion of simple DNA repeats causes over 45 human, predominantly neurodegenerative, inherited disorders. Huntington disease is a fatal, inherited, neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the huntingtin gene (HTT), resulting in a toxic polyglutamine tract in the huntingtin protein. The disease leads to progressive motor, cognitive and psychiatric decline, primarily resulting from loss of medium spiny neurons in the striatum. Although Huntington disease has long been viewed as a consequence of age-dependent toxicity from mutant huntingtin, genome-wide association studies have identified genetic modifiers, mostly DNA repair genes, that significantly influence disease onset and progression. These findings point to somatic CAG repeat expansions in affected tissues as a key pathological mechanism. This emerging paradigm suggests that disease progression is not solely protein-driven but also shaped at the DNA level, a mechanism that is shared among other repeat expansion disorders. Therapeutically, this discovery opens new opportunities: interventions to limit somatic repeat expansion might be effective across multiple repeat expansion diseases and, when combined with disease-specific approaches, such as huntingtin lowering in Huntington disease, might offer more effective and longer-lasting clinical benefits than either strategy in isolation. This approach also poses challenges, determining the optimal point for therapeutic intervention and how best to establish phenotypic improvement in clinical trials when the target tissue is the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41233526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.