ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of driving factors and water quality evaluation of groundwater in Quanzhou City, a typical coastal area in Southeast China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogeochemical Fingerprinting and Integrated Groundwater Quality Assessment in Northern Nansi Lake.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the drivers and threats to coastal groundwater quality has emerged as one of the critical environmental and resource management issues. In this study, 140 shallow groundwater samples were collected from the coastal plain of Quanzhou City in China. Methods applied included mathematical statistics, correlation analysis, ionic ratio, isotope techniques, hydrochemical facies evolution diagrams (HFE-D), entropy weight water quality index (EWQI), health risk evaluation model and Monte Carlo simulation. The results demonstrated that the groundwater in the study area was neutral to weakly acidic, mainly soft water and fresh water. The groundwater chemical types were mainly composed of Cl-Na (37.86%), HCO3-Ca-Na (32.14%) and HCO3-Ca (27.86%). The natural sources of groundwater chemical composition were mainly controlled by the rock weathering, evaporation and cation exchange action. Nitrate with relatively high content in groundwater was found to originate mainly from anthropogenic inputs including domestic sewage and agricultural activities. The results of the stable isotope analysis showed the contributions of potential nitrate sources were 66.6%, 21.5%, 15.0%, and 2.5% for sewage and manure, soil nitrogen, synthetic fertilizer, and atmospheric deposition, respectively. The results of EWQI indicated that the overall groundwater quality of this study area was relatively good and suitable for domestic use. However, health risk evaluation based on Monte Carlo simulation showed that the probabilities of non-carcinogenic risk from groundwater nitrate were 4.31% for males, 5.71% for females, 13.93% for children and 25.80% for infants, respectively. The intake of high nitrate content groundwater via drinking pathway would pose a threat to the health of the local residents and require attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.