ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of biomechanical behavior between flat head screw and tapered head screw in internal-hex implant-abutment connection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Titanium Base-Free Multi-Unit Abutment Connections: A Critical Review of Prosthetic Screw Design, Biomechanical Behavior, and Clinical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation aimed to evaluate the screw head configuration on its biomechanical performance. Forty-eight screws specimens with four different screw head conical surface opening angle (β) were divided in four groups (n = 12): flat screw head (FHS) with β = 0°, and tapered screw head (THS) with β = 20°, 30°, and 40°. A preload torque of 35 N·cm was applied to fasten the implant-abutment assembly. The initial removal torque values (RTVs) of half the samples in each group were measured. The remaining specimens were then subjected to fatigue tests and the postload RTVs were measured. Furthermore, four 3D prosthesis models were established for FE analysis. The results suggested that the initial and postload RTVs of FHS groups were significantly lower than THS groups (P < .05). After mechanical cycling, the original regular raised texture features on screw head surface in FHS group were almost removed and transferred, while linear grooves appeared near the bottom of the screw head cone in THS group. The FEA results indicated that the highest stress magnitude and maximum torsion angle of the screws occurred in the FHS group. In contrast, the flat-head screw exhibited larger torque loss, greater stress concentration and more severe friction and wear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.