ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based classification of histological subtypes of invasive breast cancer using MRI contralateral breast texture features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive Breast Cancer (IBC), encompassing Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC), is the most prevalent cancer in women. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for distinguishing between its histological subtypes (IDC and ILC) by analyzing glandular texture features from the contralateral breast. T1-weighted pre-contrast MRI images were sourced from the Cancer Imaging Archive, with image segmentation performed in 3D Slicer software, yielding a dataset of 2444 slices (1890 IDC, 554 ILC). First-order and GLCM texture features were extracted using MATLAB, and feature selection via ANOVA F-test revealed correlation (0.1233) and mean (0.5335) as the least significant features. Despite this, the initial model with all features achieved an accuracy of 0.9038, suggesting the importance of all extracted features. To address dataset imbalance, the SMOTE technique was applied, creating balanced training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets. Various ML algorithms were tested, and the Random Forest Classifier achieved the highest cross-validation scores for both SMOTE (0.8723 ± 0.0209) and original (0.8989 ± 0.0224) datasets. The final model achieved an accuracy of 91% on the original and 87% on the SMOTE dataset, revealing a comprehensive classification. The findings support early diagnosis and make an innovative contribution to the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.