ArticleScientific reports2025
Strain imaging in abdominal aortic aneurysms using bistatic dual-aperture ultrasound.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Validation of Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Integrated Proteomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge of the full geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and local, mechanical wall parameters using ultrasound (US) can contribute to a better assessment of the AAA's mechanical state, prediction of growth and possible risk of rupture. Such an assessment is currently limited by the anisotropic lumen-wall contrast and the resolution of conventional US. The recent introduction of ultrafast dual-aperture imaging enhances image quality, using two transducers that alternately transmit and receive simultaneously ("bistatic" US). In this study, dual-aperture, bistatic US imaging is assessed in 43 AAA patients. Results were compared to single-aperture ultrafast imaging. Bistatic imaging was demonstrated successfully in 40 patients. Compared to single-aperture imaging, the median wall-lumen generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) was significantly increased by 0.13 (+27%). By compounding axial displacements from multiple directions, we show the feasibility of local strain quantification: not only in the vessel wall but also in low contrast regions, such as the intraluminal thrombus (ILT). Multi-aperture ultrasound imaging can provide the clinician with high quality imaging, which contributes towards a better understanding of AAA development and patient-specific rupture risk analysis, by allowing the accurate assessment of tissue properties and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.