Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41233474›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CFG-DWC: a hybrid correlation-driven feature engineering framework for optimized machine learning performance in carbonation depth analysis of concrete subjected to natural environments.

Yildiran Yilmaz, Talip Çakmak, İlker Ustabaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yildiran YilmazDepartment of Computer Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Fener, Rize, TR53100, Turkey. yildiran.yilmaz@erdogan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5337-6090
Talip ÇakmakDepartment of Civil Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Fener, Rize, TR53100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0266-6132
İlker UstabaşDepartment of Civil Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Fener, Rize, TR53100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-2543

Funding

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University 02025006016546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the carbonation depth of concrete is critical to avoid structural damage and ensure durability. However, predicting carbonation depth remains challenging due to the complexity of the process, interdependencies among material parameters, and varying environmental conditions. In this study, we propose a hybrid Correlation-Driven Feature Generation (CFG) framework enhanced by a novel Dynamic Weighted Correlation (DWC) method to optimize feature selection and improve machine learning (ML) predictions. Using our new dataset of concrete samples exposed to natural conditions, we evaluated traditional correlation methods (Spearman, Pearson, Kendall's tau) alongside Dynamic Weighted Correlation (DWC), combined with ML algorithms (Linear Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost). The DWC method dynamically weights feature segments to capture both linear and non-linear relationships, generating new correlated features that significantly enhance model performance. Statistical metrics (R², MSE, RMSE, MAE) confirmed the superiority of DWC, with XGBoost achieving the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.86, 20.5% MAE reduction). Concrete age emerged as the most influential parameter across all methods. Our results demonstrate that the CFG-DWC framework not only outperforms conventional correlation techniques but also provides a robust, interpretable tool for carbonation depth prediction, enabling more durable design and maintenance of reinforced concrete structures.

Indexed as

Carbonation depthCorrelation methodsDWCMachine learningRandom forestXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41233474
PMCPMC12615768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.