ArticleScientific reports2025
CFG-DWC: a hybrid correlation-driven feature engineering framework for optimized machine learning performance in carbonation depth analysis of concrete subjected to natural environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the carbonation depth of concrete is critical to avoid structural damage and ensure durability. However, predicting carbonation depth remains challenging due to the complexity of the process, interdependencies among material parameters, and varying environmental conditions. In this study, we propose a hybrid Correlation-Driven Feature Generation (CFG) framework enhanced by a novel Dynamic Weighted Correlation (DWC) method to optimize feature selection and improve machine learning (ML) predictions. Using our new dataset of concrete samples exposed to natural conditions, we evaluated traditional correlation methods (Spearman, Pearson, Kendall's tau) alongside Dynamic Weighted Correlation (DWC), combined with ML algorithms (Linear Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost). The DWC method dynamically weights feature segments to capture both linear and non-linear relationships, generating new correlated features that significantly enhance model performance. Statistical metrics (R², MSE, RMSE, MAE) confirmed the superiority of DWC, with XGBoost achieving the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.86, 20.5% MAE reduction). Concrete age emerged as the most influential parameter across all methods. Our results demonstrate that the CFG-DWC framework not only outperforms conventional correlation techniques but also provides a robust, interpretable tool for carbonation depth prediction, enabling more durable design and maintenance of reinforced concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.