ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid Harris Hawks optimization with eagle strategy particle swarm optimization for stability and disturbance rejection in tethered UAV systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EODE-PFA: A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Pathfinder Algorithm for Engineering Optimization and Feature Selection.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the paper, a new hybrid optimization method is proposed to design an advanced attitude controller of tethered UAVs. The suggested methodology builds on the use of a Fractional-Order Proportional-Derivative-Derivative Integral (FOPDD-I) controller, which is optimized with the help of a Hybrid Harris Hawks Optimization-Eagle Strategy-Particle Swarm Optimization (HHHOESPSO) algorithm. The FOPDD-I controller is compared with Conventional PID, Cascade PID, classical Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) and Advanced ADRC methodologies. Comprehensive MATLAB simulations indicate that the FOPDD-I controller, optimized through HHHOESPSO, is more stable, responds more quickly to disturbances, and can reject disturbances better than their traditional counterparts. Significant results are a 56.5 percent increase in Kp to achieve better overall stability, a 65.2 percent increase in Ki to achieve smaller steady-state errors and better roll control and a 98.4 percent decrease in Kd to achieve smaller yaw overshoot and oscillations. Also, the fractional-order parameters are adjusted to adaptability improvement of 12.5 and 14.7 in nonlinear dynamic environment. Conversely, traditional controllers including PID and Cascade PID demonstrate only minor tuning benefits, whereas both classical and state-of-the-art ADRC approaches realize moderate performance benefits, that are not as high as the stability and responsiveness demonstrated by FOPDD-I controller. This study underscores the effectiveness of combining fractional-order control with hybrid optimization strategies, establishing the proposed FOPDD-I controller as a robust solution for tethered UAV attitude control under dynamic and uncertain conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.