ArticleScientific reports2025
Brain signal complexity tracks mind-wandering and visual perceptual learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive Processing and EEG Complexity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Often characterized as thoughts unrelated to the ongoing task, mind-wandering occupies up to 50% of our waking hours and impacts neural and behavioural functioning. Until now, research has focused on the impact of mind-wandering on immediate task performance, but its relationship to neural states that support learning-related gains over time remains unclear. Previous research examining brain signal complexity during task performance showed that periods of mind-wandering were associated with higher signal complexity compared with on-task states, reflecting increased neural flexibility. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether higher signal complexity associated with mind-wandering may represent a flexible neural state conducive to longer-term learning. Twenty-six adults underwent electroencephalography recording while performing a visual texture discrimination task before and after a training period, with their attention state probed throughout the task. Task performance improved and N1 and P3 event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes were modulated significantly following training (p's < 0.01). Moreover, greater pre- and post-training mind-wandering, better post-training performance, and larger ERP amplitudes were all associated with higher signal complexity (p's < 0.05). Overall, these results suggest that greater engagement in mind-wandering is linked to a high-flexibility brain state that supports longer-term learning in low-level perceptual tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.